WASHINGTON (AP) — The House, while narrowly rejecting a tougher Republican proposal, was moving ahead Thursday with legislation that once again makes the point that it will not go along with President Barack Obama's plans to close the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
The provision in a 2010 spending bill also puts restrictions and reporting requirements on the transfer of Guantanamo detainees to the United States and elsewhere. The bill was set for a vote later Thursday.
Already this week, the House showed its defiance of Obama's goal of shutting down the facility by approving a $100 billion war-spending bill that stipulates that it will not allow the use of federal money to close Guantanamo in the final months of this budget year. That bill is expected to be passed by the Senate soon.
Both the House and Senate want to impose strict requirements on the administration before current detainees at Guantanamo can be transferred to the United States, U.S. territories or third countries.
The Obama administration has already transferred one suspected terrorist to New York to stand trial. Another nine have been transferred to other countries and the Obama administration is negotiating with foreign leaders to accept Guantanamo detainees.
The bill before the House Thursday prohibits the release of detainees into the United States during the 2010 budget year. It would allow the transfer to the United States of detainees for prosecution or detention only after Congress has had two months to read a White House report on how it plans to shut the detention facility and disperse the inmates.
The House bill also requires the Obama administration to notify lawmakers of any plans to transfer detainees to other countries.
But the chamber also rejected an amendment by Rep. Jerry Lewis, R-Calif., that strengthened the prohibition by stopping in its tracks funding for any government activity related to closing the facility.
The amendment first went down on a 216-212 vote. After Republicans demanded a recount, it was defeated again, 213-212.
"We need to stop this administration from rushing to transfer or to resettle any more detainees at the expense of an increased risk to Americans," said Lewis, the top Republican on the Appropriations Committee.
The Obama administration had requested $60 million for the Justice Department to carry out its role in the closure.
Also on Wednesday, that House Armed Services Committee approved a measure, offered by Democratic chairman Ike Skelton of Missouri, to restrict the transfer of detainees. It states that no detainee can be transferred without the president presenting a plan dealing with possible dangers the detainees pose and requires the president to consult with governors or the chief executives of territories on proposed transfers.
The $64.4 billion spending bill funds Commerce, Justice and Science department programs at an amount nearly $7 billion above for the current fiscal year ending in September. Much of that goes to the Census Bureau, which will see its budget jump more than $4 billion, to $7.4 billion, as it prepares for the 2010 census.
The vote kicked off an ambitious effort by House Democrats to pass all 12 spending bills before Congress leaves for its August recess and avoid the budgetary standoffs that have become common in recent years.
Last March, President Barack Obama signed a massive $410 billion "omnibus" that belatedly funded non-defense programs across the federal government. That catchall bill was needed because of the inability of the George W. Bush administration and the Democratic-controlled Congress to reach agreements on separate spending bills.
The House got off to a rocky start, with Democrats, confronted with more than 100 Republican amendments, breaking with tradition and, to the outrage of Republicans, limiting the number of amendments that could be offered and restricting the time spent on each amendment.
"There was a very real fear on our side that the process could have degenerated into a drawn-out battle," jeopardizing efforts to complete the bills on time, Rules Committee chairman Louise Slaughter, D-N.Y. said.
"I think the majority is making a big mistake," said Rep. Lincoln Diaz-Balart, R-Fla. "We're witnessing a sad page in the history of this body."
